Blog

I've become quite fascinated by the way people use social media to potentially build relationships with people they do not know. In particular, I'm intrigued by the suggestion that social media is different to other forms of communication. We hear a lot about how it allows us to build personal relationships, to speak to anyone and everyone - and yet, at the same time, I read a lot of comments about ignorance taking place.

To get a better understanding of that I'm doing a quick experiment this week by monitoring the responses I get this on Twitter and Facebook. All week I will record all the Re-tweets, likes and shares I make in response to other people's posts. I will also be recording the responses I get from those posters, for instance, will those using the hash tag #journorequest let me know they appreciate my re-tweets or responses to their tweets or will they ignore the fact that someone has responded to them?

It should be interesting to see if people are using social media to make connections with others, or simply to broadcast their own messages.  

I'll never forget a conversation I had with Alastair Campbell, what seems now like many years ago on whether or not Gordon Brown was going to be the first PM to lose an election based on personality. Having been Tony Blair's head of communications on several successful campaigns he should have known a thing or two about promoting personality, but, he posited, the next election would be won on policies, not the persona of the future Prime Minister.

I still believe Alastair was very wrong, in fact I felt very sure at the time that he knew he was wrong and that Gordon would lose as much, if not more on personality than on policies. Ever since Saatchi and Saatchi began sculpting the public image of future PMs we have seen more and more focus on PR and personality than we have on effective policies in the UK. We are now at the point where, minority parties like UKIP, the Green Party and the SNP aside, the public has little taste nor time for politicians of the historically main parties. This is in part due to scandals that have impacted on them all and actions by individuals within various parties. It is also, to my mind, as much to do with the homogenising of politicians at the hands of media trainers and Communications Directors who put more emphasis on format over content. The image is now all that matters.  

Back in 2010 Gordon Brown stood to lose the election not because he as battling with a global economy in crisis, not because he was dealing with a war on terror or because he had made a hash of pensions. He was set to lose it because more people liked the "look" of David Cameron or Nick Clegg more than the steady at the wheel, no fuss former Chancellor. And now, as we sit on the verge of another general election, things look set to go full circle. I don't believe Cameron will lose the election on the back of his policies and performance over the last five years as much as he will due to the fact that the electorate no longer (if they ever really did) warm to her personality. He is being saved by the fact that Ed Miliband is seen as an even less palatable leader from a pretty picture point of view and Nick Clegg committed political suicide with his dumping of pledges on student loans etc.

The people gaining ground and votes are those that have or are stepping out of the shadow of the grey suited spin mandarins, the bland doctors of stick to saying nothing and being as non-committal as possible. The likes of Nigel Farage, Boris Johnson and even Pretender Princes like Russell Brand gain credence through exhibiting real personality - as odd and potentially distasteful as they may be. These rebels in search of applause connect with the electorate because they have a semblance of humanity about them, they are not some amorphous clone who offers neither public personality, principles nor policies that differ from the opposition.

We are now in the age of "pick me, I'm the least different" except the public is weary of being sold the same old dull package; if Ed or David want to be clear winners in May, they may just have to cast off the uniform suits they have clothed themselves in and start to look like human beings again - who knows, the public might actually appreciate a bit of real personality, one that they feel they could vote for, not against. 

If your business has not woken up to the smell of strong coffee in the digital consumer age and grabbed the opportunities it offers, then you may be missing the boat; that’s the message from Nicholas Lovell in The Curve.

The Curve

It’s been a while since I’ve read a business book as well crafted, illustrated, informative and easy to read as The Tipping Point, but this one certainly ranks alongside Malcolm Gladwell’s best seller in my opinion.

Lovell, a man who knows a thing or two about being successful in the digital business world, espouses his well backed up theory of The Curve – the concept that to in order win and keep customers in the economy of shrinking costs, rising value expectations and fluid customer bases, business owners need to focus on high value customers and not high volumes.  He also wants to free you from the tyranny of the physical to embrace all that the digital world of the web and social media can offer you.

For years businesses have tried giving things away as loss leaders, Lovell argues the case for giving more away (it’s so much easier in the Internet age of cheap duplication) to engage with customers, get them liking your products/services and ultimately spending as much as they like on what they value the most. He dares you to ask your customers what they like best and then let them pay what they want for it – you will be surprised at the results.

To some this may seem anathema to all they have done before, to those that see it as a radical opportunity to be grasped I suspect Lovell will tip his hat in admiration.

The book is illustrated with examples of how the Curve has worked in the music, gaming and leisure industries but to Lovell’s credit he extends the strategy to a host of others; and even provides template examples for everything from Premiership football to accountancy.

Lovell writes in a welcomed refreshing style with candour and humour, something you don’t find too often. This is truly reflective book written for its time – read it now or miss the boat.

This morning was filled with joy and delight for me; no I did not win the lottery, no one gave me a Lamborghini and I did not sign a fantastic new client. As good as any of those would have been my life was brightened by the postman delivering this year's seed order for the allotment.

I love this time of year in the gardening calendar as it's full of promise of unexpected delights. Those 20 packets of seed could produce a wealth of wonderful vegetables for me and my family to enjoy from June till next April.
All this planning for harvest got me thinking. I'd spent a long time looking at the wide range of different tomatoes, cabbages and carrots that I could sow. I considered what had worked before, what my family did not enjoy eating and which plants were a waste of time for us to grow. In other words, I'd spent time doing my market research in the hope of getting my choice of seed right. With any crop it's almost impossible to determine which will come good and which won't – the variables are quite considerable. Take for instance carrots. My neighbour cannot grow them for toffee but I have regular success. The seeds are the same, the difference is I prepare my ground a little better and use companion planting to keep the carrot fly away. This year I've chosen a seed that is resistant to carrot fly to improve my chances even more.

Choosing your seed and preparing your ground is just the same as getting your marketing strategy right. You have to know what makes people respond positively to your offer, you have to have all the things necessary in place so that your offer bears fruit and your marketing message has to be right in order for the seed you sow in people's minds to germinate.

If you are planning your future business harvest, make sure you pick the right seed, tender the marketing seedlings and feed your market well with good messages – that way you can look forward to a great harvest festival.

I’m not a complete technophobe and appreciate the need to communicate in ways which connect with our important audiences but I can’t help wondering if Twitter is becoming a victim of its own success.

I use Twitter to inform people about events, business tips, news and stuff that my clients are up to on a daily basis and have found it valuable in greater and lesser degrees. I have never gone in for the idea of monitoring everything on my account but this week I’ve kept a little track record of events, which I think tells an interesting story.

I quite often retweet people in a random manner, even folk I don’t know. If I think the information is interesting, valuable or beneficial to my followers or is just a “good cause” I’ll happily RT it – after all, what does it cost to hit a button? I’ve done about 12 of these this week and not one Tweeter has bothered to say thanks. Now I’m not looking for huge bags of praise, I don’t do it for return as I prefer to believe in giving – but it seems to me that this communication is only going one way when this happens; it’s very poor public relations and I’m certainly less inclined to RT these people again.

I’m also wondering if I’m the only one getting frustrated with people that post things and then ignore you after you reply. I’ve tried to have conversations with over ten different people this week that have not replied to direct questions/comments about their tweets. Some of them are big name journalist but others are commentators or business gurus and sole operators – so I see no excuse for not responding? I’ve had replies from a DJ in Ibiza, an accountant in Lincoln and a number of medium sized businesses that I’ve never spoken to before, but my requests for engagement have fallen on deaf ears among people I suspect of setting up auto-tweets to which they have no intention of responding. I’ve read other comments that the big names on Twitter don’t have the time to reply to people because they are so popular, in which case they are not communicating but engaging in propaganda.

If BBC Six Music presenter Gideon Coe can take the time to reply, how come so many others cannot? I believe it’s because Twitter’s information pipe is so full to bursting with automated stuff that half the time there is actually no one there to talk back to you. If you aren’t going to fully engage in communication you really should not bother in the first place #justsaying. 

http://descuentalo.com.mx/tienda-online/uber-taxi-privado-descuentos-cupones-promociones/ . jasa seo